SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Is Evidence-Based Medicine Relevant to the Developing World?
4 references·4 citing·33 second hop
Is Evidence-Based Medicine Relevant to the Developing World? (2005)Is Evidence-Based Medicine Relevant to th…Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis (2003)Number of published systemati…Where now for meta-analysis? (2002)Where now for meta-analysis?Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered (2000)Small is beautiful: economics…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…A scoping review on quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews and meta-analysis of real-world studies (2023)A scoping review on quality a…An assessment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for non-communicable diseases (NCDs): more and higher quality research is required in less developed countries (2015)An assessment of randomized c…Monitoring the ability to deliver care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of health facility assessment tools (2014)Monitoring the ability to del…Promoting development and use of systematic reviews in a developing country (2009)Promoting development and use…An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation (1989)Research Capacity Building for Development: From Old to New Assumptions (2004)Strategies to Promote the impact of Systematic reviews on healthcare policy: a systematic review of the literature (2011)Biomedical and health research geography in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (2019)Biomedical and public health reviews and meta-analyses in Ethiopia had poor methodological quality: overview of evidence from 1970 to 2018 (2019)A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. (2000)Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (2004)Prevention and management of chronic disease: a litmus test for health-systems strengthening in low-income and middle-income countries (2010)Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence (1997)Citation Classics in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Who Wrote the Top 100 Most Cited Articles? (2013)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist. (2015)A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals (2019)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Methodologic Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2003)Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment, relative to standard care—an international randomised controlled trial (2012)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Stroke Research Disparity in Southeast Asia: Socioeconomic Factors, Healthcare Delivery, and Stroke Disease Burden (2020)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)SOCIAL VALIDITY: THE CASE FOR SUBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT or HOW APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IS FINDING ITS HEART 1 (1978)The Collectivist Organization: An Alternative to Rational-Bureaucratic Models (1979)Reconciling Efficient Markets with Behavioral Finance: The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered2,612 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 2002Where now for meta-analysis?160 cited
  • 2003Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis112 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Monitoring the ability to deliver care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of health facility assessment tools52 cited
  • 2009Promoting development and use of systematic reviews in a developing country39 cited
  • 2015An assessment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for non-communicable diseases (NCDs): more and higher quality research is required in less developed countries24 cited
  • 2023A scoping review on quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews and meta-analysis of real-world studies14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work