SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Meta-analysis: A Tool for Evidence-based Practice
12 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Meta-analysis: A Tool for Evidence-based Practice (2001)Meta-analysis: A Tool for Evidence-based …Facilitating the work of a meta-analyst (1999)Facilitating the work of a me…An Overview of Meta-Analysis (1999)An Overview of Meta-AnalysisThe Delphi List (1998)The Delphi ListQuantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Quantitative Synthesis in Sys…Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Discrepancies between Meta-An…Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare? (1996)Large trials vs meta-analysis…Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials (1996)Large Trials vs Meta-analysis…Meta-analysis: Statistical alchemy for the 21st century (1995)Meta-analysis: Statistical al…On the Reliability of Meta-Analytic Reviews (1993)On the Reliability of Meta-An…The potential and limitations of meta-analysis. (1991)The potential and limitations…Measurement of quality of primary studies for meta-analysis. (1991)Measurement of quality of pri…Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. (1980)Statistical versus traditiona…Combining Evidence in Nursing Research (2005)Combining Evidence in Nursing…An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)A random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes (2010)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)The case of the misleading funnel plot (2006)The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (2007)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. (1998)Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts: A Meta‐Analytic Review (2010)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Can meta-analyses be trusted? (1991)Meta-analysis: Neither quick nor easy (2002)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment (1988)Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis (1992)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The psychology of sex differences (1975)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Integrative reviews of nursing research (1987)Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques (1997)The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (1995)Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias? (1995)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Meta-Analyses and Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1998)Comparison of Large Versus Smaller Randomized Trials for Mental Health-Related Interventions (2005)Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews2,515 cited
  • 1998The Delphi List2,426 cited
  • 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
  • 1996Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials355 cited
  • 1980Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings.353 cited
  • 1995Meta-analysis: Statistical alchemy for the 21st century338 cited
  • 1991The potential and limitations of meta-analysis.125 cited
  • 1996Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?60 cited
  • 1993On the Reliability of Meta-Analytic Reviews54 cited
  • 1991Measurement of quality of primary studies for meta-analysis.39 cited
  • 1999Facilitating the work of a meta-analyst23 cited
  • 1999An Overview of Meta-Analysis19 cited

Cited by

  • 2005Combining Evidence in Nursing Research330 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work