No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The Printed Dissemination of the Roman Gradual in Italy during the Early Modern Period Richard J. Agee (bio) In the last few decades, music historians have produced a number of important studies on early modern printing in Europe. Many of these projects have focused on single printing firms, although some also focused, at least in passing, on relationships among printers.1 My own interest in the transmission of plainchant during this period stems from research that I carried out on the publications of the second generation of Gardano family printers.2 While information on the locations and contents of sources for their printed instrumental and polyphonic vocal music may be found in the printed catalogs of individual libraries, as well as in the RISM publications and elsewhere,3 references to books of plainchant sometimes prove rather elusive and diffuse. However, the data available on these plainchant editions has increased substantially with [End Page 9] the advent of RELICS—that is, Renaissance Liturgical Imprints: A Census4—as well as the work of Marco Gozzi and other scholars who are carrying out research on liturgical books now held at the Feininger Collection in Trent.5 The publication of Roman gradual choirbooks in Italy flourished during the Renaissance and early modern periods. References to nearly forty such editions, published from 1499 until 1653, appear in the literature, as seen in table 1. Eliminated from consideration here is the small incunabular "Gradual," referred to by Duggan and others, printed in 1477 by the Moilli brothers in Parma.6 The chants of the Ordinary on its pages suggest its character as a Kyriale, although the book also contains the Office and Mass for the Dead—the publishing house itself referred to the book as a "canturia."7 In any case, its lack of affinity to the other liturgical books treated here prompts its omission. A few tiny Franciscan graduals have also been excluded for similar reasons.8 Finally, the chosen cutoff date of 1653 for the printed books considered here marks the [End Page 10] Click for larger view View full resolution Table 1. Graduals of the Roman Rite Published in Italy, 1499-1653 [Begin Page 11] beginning of a period of decline in the frequency of the appearance of graduals published in Italy.9 This essay follows the transmission of the Roman gradual in both bibliographical and musical terms based on copies of at least a single exemplar of each surviving source in one form or another (some, however, [End Page 12] only in fragmentary states). Although still in its initial stages, this research has already clarified certain aspects of the repertoire's transmission as well as solidified for some graduals their publication dates and even their very identities. As seen in table 2, many of the surviving editions of the gradual had formats copied from earlier publications (as determined through concordant line endings and foliation, among other factors). Certainly a printing concern would have saved time and bother by copying the layout of one of its previous editions, as did the house of Giunta in 1527, and again in 1560, 1606, 1611, 1618, and 1626. Since the Giunta firm had previously formed a partnership with Baba, the copy of the 1647 Giunta edition by Baba in 1653 should come as no surprise.10 Certainly if two publishing firms operated within the city, then such copying must have involved some sort of collaboration or tacit permission. After all, the members of the printing industry in the city, if not friends, were at least acquainted—for instance, documents from late 1580s record meetings of the numerous officers of the Venetian printing guild in the living room of its prior, Angelo Gardano.11 Such borrowing of format could also have taken place by printers outside of Venice, as in the Porris edition issued in Turin in 1512, apparently copied from the gradual published by Giunta in 1499/1500. Obviously there would be no prosecutable privilege infringement here, since Turin lay outside the jurisdiction of the Venetian Republic. It is possible, of course, that Porris requested permission from Giunta for the reprint, although the production of a new Giunta gradual beginning in the following year, 1513...
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.