Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisisGerard Urrútia, Xavier Bonfill2010-03-08articleMedicina Clínica1,370 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Writing and PublishingSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,370 citations exist upstream.References2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studiesCited by2016La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA2021Between Level Up and Game Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Gamification in Education2020Women Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review to Outline the Boundaries of Scientific Literature2013Standards on how to develop and report systematic reviews in Psychology and Health2017The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale: A systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis2016The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA2022The implementation of the SDGs in universities: a systematic review2020Entrepreneurship and Family Role: A Systematic Review of a Growing Research