SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evolución de la investigación clínica publicada por los dermatólogos españoles y comparación con otros grupos en 2008
8 references·0 citing·31 second hop
Evolución de la investigación clínica publicada por los dermatólogos españoles y comparación con otros grupos en 2008 (2010)Evolución de la investigación clínica pub…Classification and appraisal of the level of clinical evidence of publications from the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons for the past 10 years (2009)Classification and appraisal …Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAE…Interobserver Agreement in the Application of Levels of Evidence to Scientific Papers in the American Volume of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2004)Interobserver Agreement in th…Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)Poor-quality medical research…Does blinding of readers affect results of meta-analyses? (1997)Does blinding of readers affe…[Suitability of MEDLINE for the study of the Spanish scientific production in biomedicine and medical sciences. A comparative appraisal with the Science Citation Index]. (1997)[Suitability of MEDLINE for t…Clinical Research in General Medical Journals (1979)Clinical Research in General …Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? (2006)International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal (2007)Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (2008)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: a meta-analysis of study quality and effect size (2009)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? (1997)Clinical Research Publication by Spanish Dermatologists Over Time and in Comparison With Other Research Groups in 2008 (2010)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)Levels of Evidence in Research Published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) Over the Last Thirty Years (2009)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Neighborhood socioeconomic status and child sleep duration: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Loose Connections between Peer-Reviewed Clinical Journals and Clinical Practice (1990)Clinical studies in surgical journals—have we improved? (1993)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Bibliometric analysis of spanish scientific publications on tobacco use during the period 1970–1996 (1999)Producción española en tabaquismo a través del Science Citation Index (1999-2003). Situación en el contexto mundial y de la Unión Europea (2007)Spanish Productivity in Smoking Research Relative to World and European Union Productivity From 1999 Through 2003, Analyzed With the Science Citation Index (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2005LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS359 cited
  • 2002Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?287 cited
  • 1979Clinical Research in General Medical Journals213 cited
  • 2004Interobserver Agreement in the Application of Levels of Evidence to Scientific Papers in the American Volume of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery100 cited
  • 1997[Suitability of MEDLINE for the study of the Spanish scientific production in biomedicine and medical sciences. A comparative appraisal with the Science Citation Index].43 cited
  • 2009Classification and appraisal of the level of clinical evidence of publications from the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons for the past 10 years19 cited
  • 1997Does blinding of readers affect results of meta-analyses?18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work