Voluntary Changes in Surgery Career Paths: A Survey of the Program Directors in Surgery

Jon Benjamin Morris · Thomas J. Leibrandt · Robert S. Rhodes

70 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the American College of Surgeons

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Diversity and Career in Medicine Innovations in Medical Education Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article attempts to quantify the current scope of attrition, identify the reasons why categorical residents are leaving general surgery residency programs voluntarily, and correlate the program directors' and residents' perspectives. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire asked the Program Directors of general surgery residency programs how many categorical residents left voluntarily in the 2000-2001 academic year, their postgraduate (PGY) levels, why they left, and where they went. Another questionnaire asked the residents why they entered surgery and why they left. The surveys' responses were compared. RESULTS: A total of 206 programs (81%) responded. One hundred ten programs (53%) reported voluntarily attrition of 167 categorical residents (mean: 0.8 residents per program for all responders and 1.5 residents per program for programs that reported attrition). Seventy-three programs (66%) lost one resident; 23 programs (21%), 2 residents; 9 programs (8%), 3 residents; 4 programs (4%), 4 residents; and 1 program (<1%), 5 residents. Eighty-five PGY-1 residents (51%), 42 PGY-2 residents (25%), 27 PGY-3 residents (16%), and 13 PGY-4 residents (8%) left. The most common reasons for attrition cited by the program directors were personal and work hours/lifestyle in 40% and 35%, respectively. One hundred five residents (63%) entered other fields of medicine; 40 residents transferred to other general surgery programs. Net voluntary attrition, defined as the number of residents who left general surgery voluntarily (127) divided by the resident population at risk, was 3%, indicating that 97% of the residents at risk in the responding programs remained in general surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Most surgery programs that responded were affected by attrition in 2000-2001, with approximately one-third losing more than one resident. Attrition tends to occur early in training. Most residents enter other specialties, primarily for quality-of-life reasons. But many stay in general surgery.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 70 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Contemporary Trends in Student Selection of Medical Specialties 1999Attrition in graduate surgical education: an analysis of the 1993 entering cohort of surgical residents 1998The Nature and Fate of Categorical Surgical Residents Who “Drop Out”

Cited by

2005‘You learn better under the gun’: intimidation and harassment in surgical education 2014Grit: A marker of residents at risk for attrition?2009Attrition of categoric general surgery residents: results of a 20-year audit 2017Association of General Surgery Resident Remediation and Program Director Attitudes With Resident Attrition 2016National Orthopedic Residency Attrition: Who Is At Risk?2011Academic Careers and Lifestyle Characteristics of 171 Transplant Surgeons in the ASTS★2019Why do trainees leave hospital-based specialty training? A nationwide survey study investigating factors involved in attrition and subsequent career choices in the Netherlands 2017Who Makes It to the End?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.