Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Alternative Methods for Formal Literature Review and Meta-Analysis in AHCPR Patient Outcomes Research Teams

16 references·2 citing·27 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
1988Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis10,330 cited
1954The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments5,374 cited
1982Meta-analysis in social research3,912 cited
1987QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE11,637 cited
1992A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction1,517 cited
1987Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research1,471 cited
1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
1993Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations1,404 cited
1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
1987Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research1,267 cited
1992Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction1,138 cited
1978Combining results of independent studies.910 cited
1992Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis640 cited
1992Meta-analysis: State-of-the-Science

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

499 cited

1989A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials420 cited

Cited by

1997Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis93 cited
2001The methodologic quality of clinical trials on regional anesthesia for cataract surgery11This article is based on research conducted by the Johns Hopkins University under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, formerly the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (contract no.: 290-97-0006). The authors of this article are responsible for its contents, including any clinical or treatment recommendations. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the United States Department of Health and Human Services.14 cited