Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Systematic Reviews of Nonrandomized Clinical Studies in the Orthopaedic Literature

13 references·2 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
1997Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures2,413 cited
1998Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies997 cited
2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions762 cited
2003The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials258 cited
2002THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000243 cited
2001Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery190 cited
1987Avoidance of large biases and large random errors in the assessment of moderate treatment effects: The need for systematic overviews178 cited

Cited by

2013What Are the Levels of Evidence on Which We Base Decisions for Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Bone Tumors?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

26 cited

2007Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in coloproctology: interpretation and potential pitfalls19 cited