SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Pitfalls in the use of kappa when interpreting agreement between multiple raters in reliability studies
12 references·0 citing·25 second hop
Pitfalls in the use of kappa when interpreting agreement between multiple raters in reliability studies (2013)Pitfalls in the use of kappa when interpr…Resolving the paradoxes (2008)Resolving the paradoxesThe Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements (2005)The Kappa Statistic in Reliab…The κ statistic in rehabilitation research: An examination11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated. (2004)The κ statistic in rehabilita…Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity (2000)Bias and prevalence effects o…Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Bias, prevalence and kappaHigh agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low kappa:…High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low Kappa:…STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSES…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Measuring nominal scale agree…Akufo and Ibarapa (1965)Akufo and IbarapaA Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations (2007)The spread of true and false news online (2018)Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies (1983)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation (2018)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter (2005)Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa (2009)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Measurement of Observer Agreement (2003)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)Method agreement analysis: A review of correct methodology (2010)Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans. (2015)New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1986STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT47,910 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 1965Akufo and Ibarapa16,856 cited
  • 1971Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.8,717 cited
  • 2005The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements4,093 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
  • 1993Bias, prevalence and kappa2,175 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes1,836 cited
  • 2000Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity288 cited
  • 2008Resolving the paradoxes224 cited
  • 2004The κ statistic in rehabilitation research: An examination11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.132 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work