References

• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
• 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
• 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
• 2001Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998159 cited
• 2006Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?110 cited
• 2005Bibliometric analysis of the literature of randomized controlled trials.89 cited
• 2006Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology73 cited
• 2011Mapping randomized controlled trials of treatments for eczema - The GREAT database (The Global Resource of Eczema Trials: a collection of key data on randomized controlled trials of treatments for eczema from 2000 to 2010)