SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?
0 references·8 citing·28 second hop
Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements? (2010)Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnosti…The framing of research questions using the PICOT format in randomized controlled trials of venous ulcer disease is suboptimal: A systematic survey (2017)The framing of research quest…Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor three‐dimensional transperineal ultrasound: a systematic review (2016)Quality of reporting of diagn…Is There an Association between STARD Statement Adherence and Citation Rate? (2016)Is There an Association betwe…Framing of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature (2016)Framing of research question …Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria (2014)Reporting standards in cardia…Randomized Controlled Trials in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of Compliance to CONSORT Statement (2014)Randomized Controlled Trials …Adherence to reporting guidelines in observational studies concerning exposure to persistent organic pollutants and effects on semen parameters (2014)Adherence to reporting guidel…The reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimates (2012)The reporting quality of stud…The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map (2018)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study (2015)Evaluation of the reporting quality of observational studies in master of public health dissertations in China (2020)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation? (2016)Are Study and Journal Characteristics Reliable Indicators of “Truth” in Imaging Research? (2017)Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? (2023)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery (2006)A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature (2013)The Structure of Research Questions in Randomized Controlled Trials in the Rehabilitation Field (2020)How to Write Effective Prompts for Screening Biomedical Literature Using Large Language Models (2025)A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in Children (2008)Defining the Review Question and Developing Criteria for Including Studies (2008)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016Framing of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature20 cited
  • 2016Is There an Association between STARD Statement Adherence and Citation Rate?19 cited
  • 2014Randomized Controlled Trials in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of Compliance to CONSORT Statement17 cited
  • 2012The reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimates15 cited
  • 2014Adherence to reporting guidelines in observational studies concerning exposure to persistent organic pollutants and effects on semen parameters11 cited
  • 2014Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria9 cited
  • 2017The framing of research questions using the PICOT format in randomized controlled trials of venous ulcer disease is suboptimal: A systematic survey9 cited
  • 2016Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor three‐dimensional transperineal ultrasound: a systematic review8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work