SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Impact Factor Follies
4 references·0 citing·21 second hop
The Impact Factor Follies (2008)The Impact Factor FolliesEpidemiologists (of All People) Should Question Journal Impact Factors (2008)Epidemiologists (of All Peopl…Show me the data (2007)Show me the dataArgument by Analogy (2005)Argument by AnalogyWhy the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Impact Factor (2009)Why do statistics journals have low impact factors? (2009)Journal Impact Factor: Do the Numerator and Denominator Need Correction? (2016)Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought (1995)Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education (2011)Making time: ‘Living floors’, ‘palimpsests’ and site formation processes – A perspective from the open-air Lower Paleolithic site of Revadim Quarry, Israel (2011)Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning (2013)A classification system for argumentation schemes (2015)Leviathan; or, The Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil (2017)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact (2009)The Altmetric Score: A New Measure for Article-Level Dissemination and Impact (2015)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2007Show me the data279 cited
  • 2005Argument by Analogy145 cited
  • 2008Epidemiologists (of All People) Should Question Journal Impact Factors42 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work