SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research Funding in Open Science
12 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Research Funding in Open Science (2013)Research Funding in Open ScienceOpen Initiatives: Offenheit In Der Digitalen Welt Und Wissenschaft (2012)Open Initiatives: Offenheit I…Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Anatomy of open access publis…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The Development of Open Acces…Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Open Access to the Scientific…Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications (2007)Peer review for improving the…Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications (2006)Peering at peer review reveal…Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance (2004)Interactive journal concept f…Something rotten at the core of science? (2001)Something rotten at the core …Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research? (1996)Peer review of grant applicat…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceThe reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals (2011)Threats to objectivity in peer review: the case of gender (2014)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)When worlds collide: Social science, politics, and the Rind et al. (1998) child sexual abuse meta-analysis. (2002)What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"? (2007)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Open Access (2012)Anatomy of green open access (2013)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication (2000)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship (2006)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)Little Science, Big Science (1963)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review (2009)Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use? (2011)Big Data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone (2014)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Wikipedia and academic peer review (2008)Research Governance in Academia: Are There Alternatives to Academic Rankings? (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 2011The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009753 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 2010Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009526 cited
  • 2012Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure364 cited
  • 2001Something rotten at the core of science?105 cited
  • 2007Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications99 cited
  • 1996Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?93 cited
  • 2004Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance85 cited
  • 2006Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications71 cited
  • 2012Open Initiatives: Offenheit In Der Digitalen Welt Und Wissenschaft19 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work