A Coefficient of Imbalance for Content Analysis

Irving L. Janis · Raymond H. Fadner

88 citations0/0 files storedPsychometrika

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Computational and Text Analysis Methods Media Studies and Communication Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

Abstract

This article presents a Coefficient of Imbalance applicable to any type of communication that may be classified into favorable content, unfavorable content, neutral content, and non-relevant content. The combined influence of the average presentation of relevant content and the average presentation of total content is reduced to two components, the coefficients of favorable imbalance and of unfavorable imbalance. A precise definition of imbalance is developed and measured against ten criteria.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 88 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2016The Face of the Firm: The Influence of CEOs on Corporate Reputation 2016Measuring Organizational Legitimacy in Social Media: Assessing Citizens’ Judgments With Sentiment Analysis 2014It's (Change in) the (Future) Economy, Stupid: Economic Indicators, the Media, and Public Opinion 2014How publics react to crisis communication efforts 2014How Do Environmental Violation Events Harm Corporate Reputation?2018Managing stakeholder perceptions: Organized hypocrisy in CSR disclosures on Facebook 2016Celebrity and Infamy? The Consequences of Media Narratives About Organizational Identity 2018Who is responsible for Twitter’s echo chamber problem? Evidence from 2016 U.S. election networks

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.