Beauty and Duty in Kant's Critique of Judgement

Henry E. Allison

26 citations0/0 files storedKantian Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations Philosophical Ethics and Theory Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art

Abstract

At the end of §40 of the Critique of Judgement, after a discussion of the sensus communis and its connection with taste, Kant writes: If we could assume that the mere universal communicability as such of our feeling must already carry with it an interest for us (something we are, however, not justified in inferring from the character of a merely reflective power of judgment), then we could explain how it is that we require from everyone as a duty, as it were (gleichsam), the feeling in a judgment of taste. (5: 296; 162)

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1982Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy 2020Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory 1995Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory 1983Essays in Kant's Aesthetics 1982Kant and the Claims of Taste.1974Kant's aesthetic theory 1975Kant's Aesthetic Theory.1995"The Beautiful Is the Symbol of the Morally-Good": Kant's Philosophical Basis of Proof for the Idea of the Morally-Good

Cited by

2012Reason, Revelation, and History in Lessing and Kant 2012Transcendental Realism, Empirical Realism, and Transcendental Idealism

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.