Perspectivism: ‘Type’ or ‘bomb’?

Bruno Latour

265 citations0/0 files storedAnthropology Today

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Posthumanist Ethics and Activism Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis Geographies of human-animal interactions

Abstract

In this editorial Bruno Latour reviews a debate on ‘Perspectivism and animism’ between Philippe Descola (College of France) and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro (National Museum of Rio de Janeiro), that took place at Maison Suger, Institute of Advanced Studies, Paris on 30 January 2009.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 265 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2016For Whom the Ontology Turns: Theorizing the Digital Real 2011Lifeworld Inc—And What to Do about it 2009The Crisis of Late Structuralism. Perspectivism and Animism: Rethinking Culture, Nature, Spirit, and Bodiliness 2016The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition 2013The anthropology of ontology (religious science?)2014Transforming translations (part 2)2017Ontological Turn, The 2012Lives With Others: Climate Change and Human-Animal Relations

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.