SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Comparative Reliabilities of Five Types of Objective Examinations. · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleComparative Reliabilities of Five Types of Objective Examinations.

G. M. Ruch1925

Article1925

Comparative Reliabilities of Five Types of Objective Examinations.

G. M. Ruch · George D. Stoddard

53 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Educational Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Educational Assessment and Pedagogy Educational Technology and Assessment

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 53 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1982Confidence marking: Its use in testing 1987What's Wrong with Three-Option Multiple Choice Items?1944Reliability of multiple-choice tests as a function of number of choices per item.1993More Evidence in Favor of Three-Option Multiple-Choice Tests 1939A Necessary Precaution in Diagnostic Testing

Details

Year1925

Typearticle

Published1925-02-01

VenueJournal of Educational Psychology

ISSN-L0022-0663

Languageen

Citations53

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Identifiers

doi10.1037/h0072894

openalex_workW1979478989

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.