Research on Resilience: Response to Commentaries

Abstract

Abstract Clarifications are provided with respect to two sets of issues raised in preceding commentaries. First, interaction effects are undoubtedly salient in resilience research; yet main effect findings can be equally critical from an intervention perspective. Second, although resilience research and prevention science reflect similar broad objectives, the former (but not usually the latter) involves explicit attention to positive adjustment outcomes in addition to the avoidance of psychopathology.

Cite this

Suniya S. Luthar, Dante Cicchetti, Bronwyn E. Becker (2000). Research on Resilience: Response to Commentaries. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00168

@article{s2000research,
  title  = {Research on Resilience: Response to Commentaries},
  author = {Luthar, Suniya S. and Cicchetti, Dante and Becker, Bronwyn E.},
  year   = {2000},
  journal = {Child Development},
  doi    = {10.1111/1467-8624.00168}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 261 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by