Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews

16 references·11 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis2,562 cited
2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
2000Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research1,795 cited
2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
1998Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis728 cited
1995Bayesian approaches to random‐effects meta‐analysis: A comparative study568 cited
1996A LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO META-ANALYSIS WITH RANDOM EFFECTS522 cited
2004Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling365 cited
1993A bivariate approach to meta‐analysis327 cited
1997INCORPORATING VARIABILITY IN ESTIMATES OF HETEROGENEITY IN THE RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL IN META-ANALYSIS272 cited
2010Sequential methods for random‐effects meta‐analysis258 cited
2006Evidence‐based sample size calculations based upon updated meta‐analysis147 cited
2006Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

110 cited

2007A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews98 cited

Cited by

2014An exploration of synthesis methods in public health evaluations of interventions concludes that the use of modern statistical methods would be beneficial29 cited
2018What have we learned after ten years of systematic reviews in international development?24 cited
2017The INVEST project: investigating the use of evidence synthesis in the design and analysis of clinical trials21 cited
2020Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of non‐Cochrane updates of systematic reviews: A cross‐sectional study19 cited
2011The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses19 cited
2018Living network meta-analysis was feasible when considering the pace of evidence generation17 cited
2019The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples15 cited
2013Simulation-Based Sample-Size Calculation for Designing New Clinical Trials and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies to Update an Existing Meta-Analysis12 cited
2024A living critical interpretive synthesis to yield a framework on the production and dissemination of living evidence syntheses for decision-making9 cited
2015Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews9 cited
2014Review and recommendations on the current practice of meta-analyses: a guide to appraise the evidence8 cited