SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review
0 references·16 citing·57 second hopsampled
The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review (2007)The future of research evaluation rests w…Mining university rankings: Publication output and citation impact as their basis (2019)Mining university rankings: P…How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia (2019)How to avoid borrowed plumes …What Influences Business Academics’ Use of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) List? Evidence From a Survey of UK Academics (2018)What Influences Business Acad…Quality assessment of scientific outputs using the BWM (2017)Quality assessment of scienti…Critical remarks on the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014 (2017)Critical remarks on the Itali…A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal quality (2016)A comprehensive examination o…Measuring the Value of Research Data: A Citation Analysis of Oceanographic Data Sets (2014)Measuring the Value of Resear…Gender and the evaluation of research (2014)Gender and the evaluation of …Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy (2014)Bibliometric evaluation vs. i…Democratising research evaluation: Achieving greater public engagement with bibliometrics-informed peer review (2013)Democratising research evalua…Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency (2012)Evaluating the performance of…The Association between Four Citation Metrics and Peer Rankings of Research Influence of Australian Researchers in Six Fields of Public Health (2011)The Association between Four …The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science (2010)The predictive validity of pe…The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities (2010)The controversial policies of…Research Governance in Academia: Are There Alternatives to Academic Rankings? (2009)Research Governance in Academ…Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences (2009)Past performance, peer review…Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The ECB's Enhanced Credit Support (2009)The Life Satisfaction Approach to Environmental Valuation (2010)Dynamic Trading and Asset Prices: Keynes vs. Hayek (2011)Status quo bias in decision making (1988)Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model (1991)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Group-based judgmental forecasting: An integration of extant knowledge and the development of priorities for a new research agenda (2010)Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field (2017)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis (1984)Industry funding and university professors’ research performance (2005)Comparative Departmental Efficiency Analysis within a University: A DEA Approach (2013)Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA (2019)Higher education policy: Why hope for quality when rewarding quantity? (2020)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1998)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals (2011)Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history (2013)Graduate Education and Social Stratification (2017)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? (2005)The Academic Ranking of World Universities (2005)Assessing the impact of software on science: A bootstrapped learning of software entities in full-text papers (2015)Assessing and tracing the outcomes and impact of research infrastructures (2016)Open Science: What, Why, and How (2017)Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice1 (2005)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method (2014)Selection of biomass thermochemical conversion technology in the Netherlands: A best worst method approach (2017)Sustainable product‐package design in a food supply chain: A multi‐criteria life cycle approach (2018)A Concentration Ratio for Nonlinear Best Worst Method (2020)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Assessing basic research (1983)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Is Inequality Among Universities Increasing? Gini Coefficients and the Elusive Rise of Elite Universities (2010)On the Predictability of Future Impact in Science (2013)The Academic Manifesto: From an Occupied to a Public University (2015)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Attitudes, Personality and Behavior (1988)Implementation of sustainable development goals: The role for business academics (2019)The Matthew effect of a journal's ranking (2020)Top business schools legitimacy quest through the Sustainable Development Goals (2020)Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)On the very idea of pursuitworthiness (2021)Reproducibility and replicability crisis: How management compares to psychology and economics – A systematic review of literature (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Do they agree? Bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise (2016)Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement (2018)Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2009Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences109 cited
  • 2019How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia101 cited
  • 2010The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities101 cited
  • 2014Measuring the Value of Research Data: A Citation Analysis of Oceanographic Data Sets88 cited
  • 2014Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy86 cited
  • 2012Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency86 cited
  • 2017Quality assessment of scientific outputs using the BWM75 cited
  • 2009Research Governance in Academia: Are There Alternatives to Academic Rankings?68 cited
  • 2018What Influences Business Academics’ Use of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) List? Evidence From a Survey of UK Academics67 cited
  • 2010The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science58 cited
  • 2014Gender and the evaluation of research57 cited
  • 2017Critical remarks on the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–201455 cited
  • 2011The Association between Four Citation Metrics and Peer Rankings of Research Influence of Australian Researchers in Six Fields of Public Health

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

53 cited
  • 2019Mining university rankings: Publication output and citation impact as their basis51 cited
  • 2013Democratising research evaluation: Achieving greater public engagement with bibliometrics-informed peer review47 cited
  • 2016A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal quality45 cited