How Long is the Peer Review Process for Journal Manuscripts? A Case Study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Lutz Bornmann · Hans‐Dieter Daniel

27 citations0/0 files storedCHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

One of the most frequently raised criticisms of the review process for manuscripts is that the length of time between submission of a manuscript and the editorial decision is overly long. Taking the journal Angewandte Chemie International Edition as an example and based on nearly 2000 manuscripts, the present study examined just how long the peer review process takes.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice 2009The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review 2009A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?

Cited by

2015Characteristics of a Megajournal: A Bibliometric Case Study 2014Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review 2016The effect of the “very important paper” (VIP) designation in Angewandte Chemie International Edition on citation impact: A propensity score matching analysis 2018Peering into peer review: Good quality reviews of research articles require neither writing too much nor taking too long

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.