SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A comprehensive comparative analysis of articles retracted in 2012 and 2013 from the scholarly literature
16 references·0 citing·39 second hop
A comprehensive comparative analysis of articles retracted in 2012 and 2013 from the scholarly literature (2015)A comprehensive comparative analysis of a…Knowledge and Attitude of Dental Professionals of North India toward Plagiarism (2014)Knowledge and Attitude of Den…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study (2013)Visibility of retractions: a …Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct (2013)Males Are Overrepresented amo…Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Why and how do journals retra…Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Science publishing: The troub…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2009)Retractions: Guidance from th…Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2009)Retractions: guidance from th…Retraction rates are on the rise (2008)Retraction rates are on the r…Empirical developments in retraction (2008)Empirical developments in ret…Science fraud: from patchwork mouse to patchwork data (2006)Science fraud: from patchwork…Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? (2006)Retractions in the research l…Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals. (2004)Retraction policies of high-i…Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Phenomena of RetractionResearch Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements (2015)Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals (2018)Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis (2019)Sexual selection and the descent of man. 1871–1971 (1975)Gender Differences in Preferences (2009)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Correction: Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Psychopathy, Academic Accountants' Attitudes toward Unethical Research Practices, and Publication Success (2014)Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications (2018)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? (2011)Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2013)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Human Error (1990)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors (2018)Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. (2012)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations (2014)Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why? (2018)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment (2013)Bonus Culture: Competitive Pay, Screening, and Multitasking (2016)The "impact factor" revisited (2005)The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
  • 2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
  • 2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008263 cited
  • 1998Phenomena of Retraction230 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?216 cited
  • 2006Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?161 cited
  • 2008Retraction rates are on the rise149 cited
  • 2009Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)94 cited
  • 2013Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct92 cited
  • 2008Empirical developments in retraction91 cited
  • 2013Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study69 cited
  • 2009Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)60 cited
  • 2004Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals.59 cited
  • 2014Knowledge and Attitude of Dental Professionals of North India toward Plagiarism

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

42 cited
  • 2006Science fraud: from patchwork mouse to patchwork data29 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.