SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals
5 references·16 citing·48 second hopsampled
Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals (2002)Discussion Sections in Reports of Control…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing (1999)How can medical journals help…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)Improving the quality of repo…Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals (1998)Discussion Sections in Report…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value (2020)Evidence-Based Research Serie…Synthesizing Evidence (2013)Synthesizing EvidenceEvaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2011)Evaluation of methodology and…Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials (2010)Empirical assessment suggests…The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2009)The origins, evolution, and f…Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research (2009)Evidence synthesis as the key…Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political uses (2006)Meta-analysis: Methods, stren…An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently (2005)An analysis of general medica…Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports (2004)Users' guide to detecting mis…Monitoring global health: time for new solutions (2004)Monitoring global health: tim…How to Write a Research Paper (2004)How to Write a Research PaperDoing New Research? Don't Forget the Old (2004)Doing New Research? Don't For…Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations (2003)Trying to do more Good than H…How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions? (2003)How many Cochrane reviews are…The Hidden Research Paper (2002)The Hidden Research PaperLessons for search strategies from a systematic review, in The Cochrane Library , of nutritional supplementation trials in patients after hip fracture (2001)Lessons for search strategies…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials (2008)Research Review: Recommendations for reporting on treatment trials for child and adolescent anxiety disorders – an international consensus statement (2020)CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study (2005)Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis (2005)Minimizing the Three Stages of Publication Bias (1990)Lost Science in the Third World (1995)Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting (2010)A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials (2011)A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation (2014)Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials (2005)In the Era of Systematic Reviews, Does the Size of an Individual Trial Still Matter? (2007)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)A meta-analysis of behavior therapy for Tourette Syndrome (2014)A META-ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND MEDICATION FOR CHILD OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER: MODERATORS OF TREATMENT EFFICACY, RESPONSE, AND REMISSION (2015)Do men become addicted to internet gaming and women to social media? A meta-analysis examining gender-related differences in specific internet addiction (2020)The Cochrane Collaboration: Evaluation of Health Care and Services Using Systematic Reviews of the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials (1998)An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors’ role in avoiding it (2017)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Is problem‐oriented policing effective in reducing crime and disorder? (2010)Barriers to, and facilitators of, parenting programmes for childhood behaviour problems: a qualitative synthesis of studies of parents’ and professionals’ perceptions (2013)The Politics of Evidence (Open Access) (2016)How to Read a Paper (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized trials (2009)Discussing study limitations in reports of biomedical studies- the need for more transparency (2012)Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of otolaryngology randomized controlled trials (2018)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Global health improvement and WHO: shaping the future (2003)Grand Challenges in Global Health (2003)Validity of reported vaccination coverage in 45 countries (2003)An Immeasurable Crisis? A Criticism of the Millennium Development Goals and Why They Cannot Be Measured (2005)A local space–time kriging approach applied to a national outpatient malaria data set (2007)G8 and strengthening of health systems: follow-up to the Toyako summit (2009)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1998Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement177 cited
  • 1998Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals169 cited
  • 1999How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing114 cited

Cited by

  • 2003Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations230 cited
  • 2004Monitoring global health: time for new solutions138 cited
  • 2004Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports106 cited
  • 2013Synthesizing Evidence103 cited
  • 2004Doing New Research? Don't Forget the Old101 cited
  • 2009Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research94 cited
  • 2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value94 cited
  • 2009The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews93 cited
  • 2006

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political uses
90 cited
  • 2001Lessons for search strategies from a systematic review, in The Cochrane Library , of nutritional supplementation trials in patients after hip fracture87 cited
  • 2005An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently76 cited
  • 2002The Hidden Research Paper75 cited
  • 2004How to Write a Research Paper74 cited
  • 2003How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions?70 cited
  • 2011Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics68 cited
  • 2010Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials63 cited