Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM modelHung-Yi Wu, Jui-Kuei Chen, I-Shuo Chen, Hsin-Hui Zhuo2012-02-21articleMeasurement164 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Multi-Criteria Decision MakingHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentEvaluation Methods in Various FieldsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 164 citations exist upstream.References1985The Analytic Hierarchy Process1977A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures1990How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process2003Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS1983Multiple Criteria Decision Making2006Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods2010Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: The Vikor method2004Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportationCited by2016HYBRID MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: A REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING2017Review of efficiency ranking methods in data envelopment analysis2014VIKOR and its Applications2013A HYBRID DYNAMIC MADM MODEL FOR PROBLEM-IMPROVEMENT IN ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS2017A hybrid MCDM approach for performance evaluation in the banking industry2013DEVELOPING A NEW HYBRID MCDM METHOD FOR SELECTION OF THE OPTIMAL ALTERNATIVE OF MECHANICAL LONGITUDINAL VENTILATION OF TUNNEL POLLUTANTS DURING AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS2021Performance evaluation of Turkish Universities by an integrated Bayesian BWM-TOPSIS model2015Evaluation of product development partners using an integrated AHP-VIKOR model