SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Tutorial for writing systematic reviews for the Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT)
16 references·3 citing·35 second hop
Tutorial for writing systematic reviews for the Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) (2014)Tutorial for writing systematic reviews f…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisQualitative Meta-Synthesis of User Experience of Computerised Therapy for Depression and Anxiety (2014)Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of…Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview (2014)Methods for knowledge synthes…The art and science of knowledge synthesis (2010)The art and science of knowle…From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance (2010)From Systematic Reviews to Cl…From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~! (2010)From Systematic Reviews to Cl…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisAMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health …Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)The Handbook of Research Synt…The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1994)The Handbook of Research Synt…Tutorial para execução de revisões sistemáticas e metanálises com estudos de intervenção em anestesia (2019)Tutorial para execução de rev…Tutorial for performing systematic review and meta-analysis with interventional anesthesia studies (2019)Tutorial for performing syste…Representation of Women on Corporate Boards of Directors and Firm Financial Performance (2019)Representation of Women on Co…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. (2003)Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. (2001)Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs for Youth: A Meta‐Analytic Review (2002)A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents (2005)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
  • 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 1995The Handbook of Research Synthesis.3,643 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
  • 1994The Handbook of Research Synthesis.1,868 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited
  • 2014Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview352 cited
  • 2010From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~!329 cited
  • 2010The art and science of knowledge synthesis195 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010
From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance
184 cited
  • 2014Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of User Experience of Computerised Therapy for Depression and Anxiety177 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Tutorial para execução de revisões sistemáticas e metanálises com estudos de intervenção em anestesia29 cited
    • 2019Tutorial for performing systematic review and meta-analysis with interventional anesthesia studies29 cited
    • 2019Representation of Women on Corporate Boards of Directors and Firm Financial Performance22 cited