SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Analysis and Implications of Retraction Period and Coauthorship of Fraudulent Publications
16 references·1 citing·42 second hop
Analysis and Implications of Retraction Period and Coauthorship of Fraudulent Publications (2013)Analysis and Implications of Retraction P…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Ethical Aspects and Dilemmas of Preparing, Writing and Publishing of the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals (2012)Ethical Aspects and Dilemmas …Ending Honorary Authorship (2012)Ending Honorary AuthorshipWhy and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Why and how do journals retra…The Scott Reuben Saga (2011)The Scott Reuben SagaScience publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Science publishing: The troub…Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…Publish or perish (2010)Publish or perishDo Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Do Pressures to Publish Incre…A Retrospective Analysis of the Trend of Retracted Publications in the Field of Biomedical and Life Sciences (2010)A Retrospective Analysis of t…The rise and fall of a physics fraudster (2009)The rise and fall of a physic…The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences (2009)The Legacy of the Hwang Case:…Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers (2008)Falsified papers in high-impa…Publish or Perish (2007)Publish or PerishA new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources (2007)A new look at evidence of sch…Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Research Misconduct, Retracti…Construction and management of retraction stigma in retraction notices: an authorship-based investigation (2022)Construction and management o…The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. (2014)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering (2013)Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web (2015)Research productivity in management schools of India during 1968-2015: A directional benefit-of-doubt model analysis (2016)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)When Authorship Fails (1997)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? (2016)The Normative Dimension in Transdisciplinarity, Transition Management, and Transformation Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning (2017)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? (2011)Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2013)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Research Ethics III: Publication Practices and Authorship, Conflicts of Interest, and Research Misconduct (2010)A visual analytic study of retracted articles in scientific literature (2012)A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases (2021)Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment (2013)Bonus Culture: Competitive Pay, Screening, and Multitasking (2016)Authorship in scientific publications: analysis and recommendations (2015)Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils (2018)Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams (2019)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)Educating English Language Learners (2006)Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism (2010)Design-Based Research (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data804 cited
  • 2007Publish or Perish728 cited
  • 2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
  • 2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008263 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?216 cited
  • 2006Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case199 cited
  • 2008Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers100 cited
  • 2007A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources85 cited
  • 2012Ending Honorary Authorship75 cited
  • 2009The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences62 cited
  • 2012Ethical Aspects and Dilemmas of Preparing, Writing and Publishing of the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals56 cited
  • 2010A Retrospective Analysis of the Trend of Retracted Publications in the Field of Biomedical and Life Sciences51 cited
  • 2010Publish or perish34 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2011
The Scott Reuben Saga
31 cited
  • 2009The rise and fall of a physics fraudster21 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Construction and management of retraction stigma in retraction notices: an authorship-based investigation13 cited