SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Livestock judges: How much information can an expert use? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleLivestock judges: How much information can an expert use?

Ruth H. Phelps1978

Article1978

Livestock judges: How much information can an expert use?

Ruth H. Phelps · James Shanteau

243 citations·0/0 files stored·Organizational Behavior and Human Performance

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Multi-Criteria Decision Making Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 243 citations exist upstream.

References

1974Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.1994The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.1975Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.1969Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker's decision process.

Cited by

1985THE EFFECTS OF FRAMING AND NEGOTIATOR OVERCONFIDENCE ON BARGAINING BEHAVIORS AND OUTCOMES.1990Database Models and Managerial Intuition: 50% Model + 50% Manager 2006Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives 2002Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not 1988Determinants of Selling Effectiveness: The Importance of Declarative Knowledge to the Personal Selling Concept 2003Psychological Models of Professional Decision Making 1988Chapter 3 What Have we Learned about Human Judgment from Thirty Years of Policy Capturing?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2009Cognitive drivers of suboptimal financial decisions: Implications for financial literacy campaignsarticle · 5 shared references 1981Research on Teachers' Pedagogical Thoughts, Judgments, Decisions, and Behaviorarticle · 4 shared references 2007The Central Question in Entrepreneurial Cognition Research 2007article · 4 shared references 2014A Sparsity-Based Model of Bounded Rationality *article · 4 shared references 1993Emotions, Arousal, and Stereotypic Judgments: A Heuristic Model of Affect and Stereotypingchapter · 4 shared references 2002Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inferencechapter · 4 shared references

Details

Year1978

Typearticle

Published1978-04-01

VenueOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance

ISSN-L0030-5073

Languageen

Citations243

Files0 public / 0

ShelfDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Identifiers

doi10.1016/0030-5073(78)90050-8

openalex_workW1982956369

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

1982Structuring decision problems and the ‘bias heuristic’