SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”?
16 references·2 citing·47 second hop
Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”? (2015)Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Real…The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 (2013)The validation of (advanced) …Reviewers’ Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals? (2013)Reviewers’ Ratings and Biblio…F 1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations (2013)F 1000 Recommendations as a P…Peer review versus citations – An analysis of best paper prizes (2012)Peer review versus citations …The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective (2011)The first Italian research as…Web of Science with the Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes: the case of computer science (2010)Web of Science with the Confe…The role of conference publications in CS (2010)The role of conference public…Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science (2010)Relative status of journal an…Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? (2010)Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) …h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)h-Index: A review focused in …Conferences vs. journals in computing research (2009)Conferences vs. journals in c…Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)Are there better indices for …Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Does the h-index for ranking …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria (1998)Comparative analysis of a set…The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology (1997)The correlation between citat…Citation analysis of computer systems papers (2023)Citation analysis of computer…An assessment into the characteristics of award winning papers at CHI (2018)An assessment into the charac…Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science (1967)Assessing basic research (1983)New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? (2007)A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact (2010)Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists (2011)Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? (1996)Problems of citation analysis (1996)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Conferences versus journals in computer science (2015)The evolution of citation graphs in artificial intelligence research (2019)Lean-Green Manufacturing Practices and Their Link with Sustainability: A Critical Review (2020)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises (1996)Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution (2005)Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities (2009)Research on Social Work Practice (2009)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)The state of h index research (2008)An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example (2011)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length (2011)The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face (2013)Research assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and difficult, but probably worth it (at least for a while) (2015)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Scientific peer review (2011)How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date? (2013)Scientific research on bullying and cyberbullying: Where have we been and where are we going (2015)Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers (2020)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime (2014)M endeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields (2015)When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? S copus versus M endeley for LIS journals (2015)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators (2014)25years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A bibliometric analysis (2015)Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact (2016)The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. (1996)The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations (2009)An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship (2010)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2009h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields849 cited
  • 2008Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine458 cited
  • 2005Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?398 cited
  • 1998Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria191 cited
  • 2010Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science139 cited
  • 1997The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology138 cited
  • 2013F 1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations131 cited
  • 2013The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000118 cited
  • 2011The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective114 cited
  • 2009Conferences vs. journals in computing research103 cited
  • 2010The role of conference publications in CS100 cited
  • 2010Web of Science with the Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes: the case of computer science77 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2013Reviewers’ Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals?47 cited
  • 2012Peer review versus citations – An analysis of best paper prizes39 cited
  • 2010Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact?36 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018An assessment into the characteristics of award winning papers at CHI13 cited
    • 2023Citation analysis of computer systems papers9 cited