Articlebronze2001

A careful consideration of the calibration concept

Steven D. Phillips · William T. Estler · Theodore D. Doiron · Keith R. Eberhardt · Mark S Levenson

46 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques Calibration and Measurement Techniques

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed discussion of the technical aspects of the calibration process with emphasis on the definition of the measurand, the conditions under which the calibration results are valid, and the subsequent use of the calibration results in measurement uncertainty statements. The concepts of measurement uncertainty, error, systematic error, and reproducibility are also addressed as they pertain to the calibration process.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2020Socio-technical scales in socio-environmental modeling: Managing a system-of-systems modeling approach 2020Calibrating the experimental measurement of psychological attributes 2008Measurand: a cornerstone concept in metrology 2017The role of human fatigue in the uncertainty of measurement 2022A Review of Metrological Supervision: Towards the Common Understanding of Metrological Traceability in Legal and Industrial Metrology 2011Measurement uncertainty in the performance verification of indicating measuring instruments 2001Developments at NIST on traceability in dimensional measurements

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.