Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform

2 references·16 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1979Political Control of the Economy.1,306 cited
1992Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts234 cited

Cited by

2006Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts221 cited
2014The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters193 cited
2008Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather than Appointed Judiciary186 cited
2014Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions157 cited
2013Preferences and Incentives of Appointed and Elected Public Officials: Evidence from State Trial Court Judges142 cited
2007POLITICAL AND JUDICIAL CHECKS ON CORRUPTION: EVIDENCE FROM AMERICAN STATE GOVERNMENTS138 cited
2008Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and “New-Style” Judicial Campaigns136 cited
2015The Judge, the Politician, and the Press: Newspaper Coverage and Criminal Sentencing across Electoral Systems133 cited
2005Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections129 cited
2009Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions116 cited
2011Confidence in the Judiciary: Comparing the Independence and Legitimacy of Judicial Systems106 cited
2009

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges' Voting

96 cited

2007Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy94 cited

2007Voting in State Supreme Court Elections: Competition and Context as Democratic Incentives86 cited

2010Judicial Independence and Retention Elections84 cited

2013Party Identification and Vote Choice in Partisan and Nonpartisan Elections83 cited