Understanding demand for innovation in the food industry

Alessandro Muscio · Gianluca Nardone · Antonio G. Dottore

46 citations0/0 files storedMeasuring Business Excellence

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovation and Knowledge Management Firm Innovation and Growth Regional Development and Innovation

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to focus on understanding how demand for innovation is articulated in low‐tech industries, dominated by SMEs, where innovation is often based on informal processes and uncodified knowledge, relying on intangible assets. Design/methodology/approach The authors hypothesize that the problems found in the innovation area are exacerbated in a traditional industry. SMEs might have difficulty understanding what their requirements might be, let alone finding the optimal provider of technologies. The authors therefore expect to find three main forms of demand: real, latent, and potential. The specific case is the food industry in Apulia, Italy. First, focus groups identified general business and technology needs. Then in‐depth interviews were conducted with 87 firms, stratified in order to be representative of food firms in Apulia. Findings The authors detected 285 different needs requiring an innovative solution. In most cases, firms understand the areas to be improved, but do not have a technological solution in mind. Demand for innovation is mostly latent. Research limitations/implications The study is narrow in geographic and industry scope. This limits generalizability, but the methodology is transferable and the results comparable. The authors studied the demand side, whereas interaction between supply and demand needs to be understood. Future studies into regional public research organizations (PROs) and intermediaries can therefore be useful. Practical implications The findings can be used to understand how PROs can engage with SMEs and what policymakers can do to facilitate the interaction. Originality/value This study applies thinking typically used in high‐tech sectors to a traditional sector, hence testing and extending the theoretical boundaries.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2003The Theory of Economic Development 1991The Competitive Advantage of Nations 2007Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance 2007Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations 2004Case Study Research 2009Building theories from case study research

Cited by

2017Innovation gaps in Scandinavian rural tourism 2016Impact of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Organization Demand for Innovation: Moderating Role of Employees Innovative Selfefficacy 2019Does the stakeholder engagement result in new drinks? Evidence from family owned SMEs 2021Health and Eco-Innovations in Food Packaging 2017The geography of university scientific production in Europe: an exploration in the field of Food Science and Technology 2017Patented Innovation and Firm Value in the U.S. Food and Drink Industry: The Economic Importance of High-Quality Product Innovation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.