SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Overconfidence, omens and gender heterogeneity: Results from a field experiment · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleOverconfidence, omens and gender heterogeneity: Results from a field experiment

Maria De Paola2014

Article2014

Overconfidence, omens and gender heterogeneity: Results from a field experiment

Maria De Paola · Francesca Gioia · Vincenzo Scoppa

30 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Economic Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.

References

1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 2001Risk as feelings.2009Gender Differences in Preferences 1998Investor Psychology and Security Market Under‐ and Overreactions 2001Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment 1983Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states.2005CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment 1982Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases

Cited by

2017Field Experiments in Organizations 2015Who performs better under time pressure? Results from a field experiment 2021Do Women Shy Away from Public Speaking? A Field Experiment 2020Impact of superstitious beliefs on the timing of marriage and childbirth: Evidence from Denmark 2022Number 19: Another Victim of the COVID-19 Pandemic?2021Confidence Charms: How Superstition Influences Overconfidence Bias in Han and the Qiang Ethnic Minority Chinese

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2013Overconfidence, Omens And Emotions: Results From A Field Experimentpreprint · 22 shared references 2015Joy Leads to Overconfidence, and a Simple Countermeasurearticle · 17 shared references 2002Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation: The Role of Idiosyncratic Trait Definitions in Self-Serving Assessments of Abilitychapter · 13 shared references 2002Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternativeschapter · 13 shared references 2002Sympathetic Magical Thinking: The Contagion and Similarity “Heuristics”chapter · 13 shared references 2002Mental Contamination and the Debiasing Problemchapter · 13 shared references

Details

Year2014

Typearticle

Published2014-11-01

VenueJournal of Economic Psychology

ISSN-L0167-4870

Languageen

Citations30

Files0 public / 0

ShelfDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.joep.2014.10.005

openalex_workW1986229800

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2022Positive fortune telling enhances men’s financial risk taking

2021Fallacies in Decision Making From an Asian Perspective