SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Inadequate reporting of controlled trials as short reports
6 references·9 citing·41 second hop
Inadequate reporting of controlled trials as short reports (1998)Inadequate reporting of controlled trials…Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines (1996)Randomised trials, human natu…Lies, damn lies, and reports of RCTs (1996)Lies, damn lies, and reports …Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement (1996)Better reporting of randomise…More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)More Informative Abstracts Re…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Should Systematic Reviewers Search for Randomized, Controlled Trials Published as Letters? (2008)Should Systematic Reviewers S…CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved (2006)Reporting of trials presented…Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind? (2002)Systematic reviews in epidemi…Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting (2002)Publication bias in gastroent…Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies (2001)Systematic Reviews of Observa…Elements of a systematic review (2001)Elements of a systematic revi…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions (2004)Selecting Studies for Systemic Review: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria (2006)Associations between sex work laws and sex workers’ health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies (2018)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Domestic Violence Against Women: Systematic Review of Prevalence Studies (2009)School-Related Outcomes of Traumatic Event Exposure and Traumatic Stress Symptoms in Students: A Systematic Review of Research from 1990 to 2015 (2016)A Delphi study to build consensus on the definition and use of big data in obesity research (2019)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment (1988)Guidelines for reading literature reviews. (1988)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials4,099 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement610 cited
  • 1990More Informative Abstracts Revisited532 cited
  • 1996Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines154 cited
  • 1996Lies, damn lies, and reports of RCTs36 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,139 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials318 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies213 cited
  • 2002Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?120 cited
  • 2001Elements of a systematic review109 cited
  • 2002Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting103 cited
  • 2006Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved100 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2008Should Systematic Reviewers Search for Randomized, Controlled Trials Published as Letters?9 cited