SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research
13 references·1 citing·40 second hop
Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research (2004)Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a…THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (2007)THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY…The Uses of Argument (2003)The Uses of ArgumentPatenting human genetic material: refocusing the debate (2000)Patenting human genetic mater…Developing Focus Group Research (1999)Developing Focus Group Resear…The Rhetoric of Eugenics in Anglo-American Thought (1998)The Rhetoric of Eugenics in A…The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise (1998)The new genetics and health: …Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (1998)Focus Groups as Qualitative R…The Rhetoric of Eugenics in Anglo-American Thought. (1997)The Rhetoric of Eugenics in A…Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (1997)Focus Groups as Qualitative R…Argumentation Theory and the Rhetoric of Assent (1994)Argumentation Theory and the …Lay constructions of genetic risk (1992)Lay constructions of genetic …Focus Groups: Theory and Practice (1990)Focus Groups: Theory and Prac…How Medicine Saved the Life of Ethics (1982)How Medicine Saved the Life o…Toulmin's Rhetorical Logic: What's the Warrant for Warrants? (2008)Toulmin's Rhetorical Logic: W…Time and modality (1957)The interdisciplinary study of coordination (1994)Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research (2001)The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1 (2006)Ethics and Language (1944)The Methods of Ethics (1962)Building on the Foundation of General Strain Theory: Specifying the Types of Strain Most Likely to Lead to Crime and Delinquency (2001)Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’ (2014)Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019)Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process (1985)Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods (1986)Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (1989)The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants (1994)Focus Groups in Social Research (2001)The qualitative research interview (2006)Science, Technology, and Human Values (1966)Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. (1971)Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science (1992)Challenging the ‘view from nowhere’: citizen reflections on specialist expertise in a deliberative process (2004)From Schism to Continuum? The Problematic Relationship Between Expert and Lay Knowledge—An Exploratory Conceptual Synthesis of Two Qualitative Studies (2005)If We Seek, Do We Learn? (2009)Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth (Penguin) 1963. (1963)Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. (1964)Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (1969)4. The rhetoric of prediction and chance in the research to clone a disease gene (1997)Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness (2007)Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups (2008)The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation (2018)The digital person: technology and privacy in the information age (2005)Diversity, Opportunity, and the Shifting Meritocracy in Higher Education (2007)Diversity Science: Why and How Difference Makes a Difference (2010)Cognitive Ableism and Disability Studies: Feminist Reflections on the History of Mental Retardation (2001)Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study (2004)Sterilizing the “Feeble‐minded”: Eugenics in Alberta, Canada, 1929–1972 (2004)Focus Groups (1996)Focus groups in feminist research (1998)How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes (2016)Focus group methodology: a review (1998)Deliberative Democracy and Beyond (2002)Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non‐heterosexual women (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Focus Groups as Qualitative Research8,856 cited
  • 2003The Uses of Argument7,099 cited
  • 1990Focus Groups: Theory and Practice3,958 cited
  • 1998Focus Groups as Qualitative Research2,800 cited
  • 1999Developing Focus Group Research1,603 cited
  • 2007THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA828 cited
  • 1982How Medicine Saved the Life of Ethics339 cited
  • 1992Lay constructions of genetic risk196 cited
  • 1998The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise177 cited
  • 1997The Rhetoric of Eugenics in Anglo-American Thought.115 cited
  • 1998The Rhetoric of Eugenics in Anglo-American Thought79 cited
  • 1994Argumentation Theory and the Rhetoric of Assent45 cited
  • 2000Patenting human genetic material: refocusing the debate43 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Toulmin's Rhetorical Logic: What's the Warrant for Warrants?27 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work