Article1999

The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax Refunds

699 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Economic Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Economic and Fiscal Studies Monetary Policy and Economic Impact Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Abstract

A central implication of the life-cycle (or permanent-income) theory is that consumption should not respond to predictable fluctuations in income. Tests of this implication have yielded mixed results, especially on micro data (Angus Deaton, 1992; Martin Browning and Annamaria Lusardi, 1996). In large part this might be due to the difficulties of isolating the predictable component of income at the micro level. Most tests proceed by instrumenting for income, but since the available instruments are typically poor, such tests might be prejudiced against finding significant excess sensitivity of consumption to income (John Shea, 1995).' Also, it is not clear how closely the resulting econometric predictions of income coincide with agents' actual expectations of income. To avoid these difficulties this paper examines the response of household consumption to a particular type of income that is both predictable and transitory-income tax refunds. Since a refund depends on events in the previous calendar year, it is predictable income as regards consumption in the year of its receipt. Consequently, under the life-cycle theory consumption should not increase on receipt of a refund.2 In addition to testing the canonical model of consumption, this paper provides estimates interpretable as the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) out of refunds. Since federal tax refunds now amount to over $80 billion per year (averaging well over $1,000 per refund), these estimates are of interest in themselves. More generally they bear on the impact of even preannounced and temporary changes in fiscal policy. The paper begins by surveying related studies in Section I. Section II describes the data, the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CEX), which of the leading U.S. micro data sets has the most comprehensive coverage of expenditure. The empirical specification is set out in Section HI. Section IV reports the results, and Section V concludes.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 699 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting 1978Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence 1989Consumption and Liquidity Constraints: An Empirical Investigation 1990Anomalies: Saving, Fungibility, and Mental Accounts 1990Who is Credit Constrained in the U. S. Economy?2001The Life-Cycle Model of Consumption and Saving 1995Is Consumption Growth Consistent with Intertemporal Optimization? Evidence from the Consumer Expenditure Survey 1990Permanent Income, Current Income, and Consumption

Cited by

1999The Reaction of Household Consumption to Predictable Changes in Social Security Taxes 2000The Savers–Spenders Theory of Fiscal Policy 2006Inattentive consumers 2007The Missing Motivation in Macroeconomics 2010Constrained after college: Student loans and early-career occupational choices 2007Cash-on-Hand and Competing Models of Intertemporal Behavior: New Evidence from the Labor Market

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.