This article proposes that we rethink the concept of ‘personal property’, and it uses the example of Mongolian rituals of death in the socialist 1980s as a context for exploring this idea. These rituals are not the occasion for dividing up property amongst inheritors (this has usually been agreed upon long before death) but involve a series of actions that specify the deceased’s relations with material things. Objects become personal property through prolonged use and physical interaction. The rites are concerned with the deceased’s relations with such things, focused on desire, relinquishment, dependence, and other emotions. The article thus shifts attention back to the ‘person‐thing’ aspect of property. It also discusses the socio‐political contexts in which such a relation becomes important and argues that socialist society did not eliminate but rather opened up contexts in which such personalization could occur. It is argued more generally that personal property so situated is quite different from the ‘private property’ that is so prominent in capitalist society. This in turn requires us to rethink the way that ‘possession’ may be imagined, and to consider forms of property that are conceptualized more in terms of human attachment to objects than as exclusionary relations vis‐à‐vis other owners. The Mongolian ethnography suggests that, just as people alter material things by long and intensive interaction with them, there are categories of personal property that also change their owners, since actions of using, giving up, donation, and so forth are ethical matters that transform the person.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 86 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.