SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Network meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: What is it and why is it posed to dominate cardiovascular decision making?
13 references·1 citing·44 second hop
Network meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: What is it and why is it posed to dominate cardiovascular decision making? (2015)Network meta-analysis for evidence synthe…Use of Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Network Meta-analysis (2014)Use of Generalized Linear Mix…Intervention Synthesis: A Missing Link between a Systematic Review and Practical Treatment(s) (2014)Intervention Synthesis: A Mis…A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta‐analysis (2012)A fully Bayesian application …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study (2006)Compliance with QUOROM and qu…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…A simple hint to improve Robinson and Dickersin's highly sensitive PubMed search strategy for controlled clinical trials (2004)A simple hint to improve Robi…Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2003)Parachute use to prevent deat…Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…FAST PRO : software for meta-analysis by the confidence profile method (1992)FAST PRO : software for meta-…A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)A comparison of results of me…Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research (2016)Network Meta-analysis to Synt…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Registering systematic reviews (2009)From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature (2011)Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update (2018)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models to Evaluate Inconsistency within a Network Meta-Analysis (2015)Software and package applicating for network meta‐analysis: A usage‐based comparative study (2017)Using the bayesmeta R package for Bayesian random-effects meta-regression (2022)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)The Use of Meta‐analysis in Pharmacoepidemiology (2000)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Identifying Diagnostic Studies in MEDLINE: Reducing the Number Needed to Read (2002)Search strategies–identified reports on “off-label” drug use in MEDLINE (2012)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Why We Need Qualitative Research in Suicidology (2010)Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study (2012)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 1992A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction1,517 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • 2003Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials1,155 cited
  • 2006Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study149 cited
  • 2004A simple hint to improve Robinson and Dickersin's highly sensitive PubMed search strategy for controlled clinical trials132 cited
  • 2014Use of Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Network Meta-analysis92 cited
  • 2012A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta‐analysis86 cited
  • 1992FAST PRO : software for meta-analysis by the confidence profile method69 cited
  • 2014Intervention Synthesis: A Missing Link between a Systematic Review and Practical Treatment(s)

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

55 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research19 cited