The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions.

Herman Mitchell · Donn Byrne

200 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Personality and Social Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Jury Decision Making Processes Social and Intergroup Psychology Psychology of Social Influence

Abstract

Tested the hypotheses that (a) attitude similarity between defendant and juror is positively related to judicial decisions favoring the defendant, and (b) juror authoritarianism is negatively related to judicial decisions favoring the defendant. In a simulated jury situation, 139 undergraduates resp

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 200 citations exist upstream.

References

1962Statistical principles in experimental design.2001The Authoritarian Personality 1972The attraction paradigm 1968Personality and Assessment 1955Principles of Criminology 1961Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity.1969Attitudes and Attraction 1971The American Jury

Cited by

1996Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning 1974A Reinforcement-Affect Model of Attraction 2012A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect 2007Gift giving: an interdisciplinary review 1995Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments.1980Socialpsychological Processes Underlying Attitudes Toward Legal Punishment 2008Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal ®

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.