Article2011

Real-Time Intersession and Interrater Reliability of the Functional Movement Screen

James A. Oñate · Thomas Dewey · Roger O. Kollock · Kathleen S. Thomas · Bonnie L. Van Lunen · Marlene DeMaio +1 more

162 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the real-time intersession and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen (FMS). The overall study consisted of 19 volunteer civilians (12 male, 7 female). The intersession reliability consisted of 12 men and 7 women, whereas 10 men and 6 women participated in the interrater reliability test session. Two raters (A and B) were involved in the interrater reliability aspect of this study. The FMS includes 7 tests: deep squat (DS), hurdle step (HS), in-line lunge (IL), shoulder mobility (SM), active straight leg raise (ASLR), trunk stability push-up (TSPU), and rotary stability (RS). Researchers analyzed the data via intraclass correlation (ICC). To determine the reliability of the intersession scoring of the FMS and the intrasession interrater scoring of the FMS a 2-way mixed effects model intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(3,1)) was used for the continuous data, whereas a weighted Cohen's kappa (κ) was used for the categorical data. The dependent variables were FMS total score (0-21 scale) and associated tests were DS, HS, IL, SM, ASLR, TSPU, and RS. Intersession reliability (ICC, SEM) and κ were as follows: FMS total score (0.92, 0.51), DS (κ = 0.69), HS (κ = 0.16), IL (κ = 0.69), SM (κ = 0.84), ASLR (κ = 0.69), TSPU (κ = 0.77), and RS (no covariance). Interrater reliability (ICC, SEM) and κ were as follows: FMS total score (0.98, 0.25), DS (κ = 1.0), HS (κ = 0.33), IL (κ = 0.88), SM (κ = 0.90), ASLR (κ = 0.88), TSPU (κ = 0.75), and RS (no covariance). The FMS total scores displayed high intersession and interrater reliabilities. Finally, with the exception of HS, all tasks displayed moderate to high intersession reliability and good to high interrater reliability.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 162 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.2005QUANTIFYING TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY USING THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AND THE SEM 2010Interrater Reliability of the Functional Movement Screen

Cited by

2013Factor Structure of the Functional Movement Screen in Marine Officer Candidates 2015The interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen: A systematic review with meta-analysis 2014The functional movement screening (fms)™: an inter-rater reliability study between raters of varied experience.2021Relationship between motor fitness, fundamental movement skills, and quality of movement patterns in primary school children 2014Real-time test-retest and interrater reliability of select physical performance measures in physically active college-aged students.2019RELIABILITY of a MOVEMENT QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL to GUIDE EXERCISE PRESCRIPTION (MOVEMENTSCREEN)

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.