SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleSocial desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires

Stephanie Booth‐Kewley2005

Article2005

Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires

Stephanie Booth‐Kewley · Gerald E. Larson · Dina K. Miyoshi

220 citations·0/0 files stored·Computers in Human Behavior

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Survey Methodology and Nonresponse Psychological Testing and Assessment Deception detection and forensic psychology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 220 citations exist upstream.

References

1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.1991Measurement and Control of Response Bias 1991Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes 1984Two-component models of socially desirable responding.1998Egoistic and Moralistic Biases in Self‐Perception: The Interplay of Self‐Deceptive Styles With Basic Traits and Motives 1999A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews.1991The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups 1953The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed.

Cited by

2012Forms, Frequency, and Correlates of Perceived Anti-Atheist Discrimination 2011Does survey format influence self-disclosure on sensitive question items?2019I’ll Show You Mine so You’ll Show Me Yours: Motivations and Personality Variables in Photographic Exhibitionism 2022The mobilization of employees’ psychological resources: how servant leadership motivates pro-customer deviance

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2014Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: A meta-analysisreview · 7 shared references 1992Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference?article · 7 shared references 2003Effects of faking on self-deception and impression management scalesarticle · 7 shared references 2006Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traitsarticle · 7 shared references 2014Response Bias, Malingering, and Impression Managementchapter · 6 shared references 2000A Quantitative Review of the Effect of Computerized Testing on the Measurement of Social Desirabilityarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2005

Typearticle

Published2005-06-14

VenueComputers in Human Behavior

ISSN-L0747-5632

Languageen

Citations220

Files0 public / 0

ShelfSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.020

openalex_workW1989765438

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2014

Blurred lines: German freelance journalists with secondary employment in public relations

2013Measuring Spiritual Fitness: Atheist Military Personnel, Veterans, and Civilians

2023The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19

2016See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil? Underreporting of abuse in care homes