SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Hierarchy of evidence and appraisal of limitations (HEAL) grading system · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleHierarchy of evidence and appraisal of limitations (HEAL) grading system

P. Cristian Gugiu2014

Article2014

Hierarchy of evidence and appraisal of limitations (HEAL) grading system

P. Cristian Gugiu

14 citations·0/0 files stored·Evaluation and Program Planning

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies 2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study 1952Research design in clinical psychology 2004A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2010A Critical Appraisal of Standard Guidelines for Grading Levels of Evidencearticle · 9 shared references 2010Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessedreview · 6 shared references 2013Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysisreview · 6 shared references 2010The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL)article · 5 shared references 2014On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policiesreview · 5 shared references 2005Rating Methodological Quality: Toward Improved Assessment and Investigationarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2014

Typearticle

Published2014-08-19

VenueEvaluation and Program Planning

ISSN-L0149-7189

Languageen

Citations14

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.08.003

openalex_workW1989940135

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.