Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage

16 references·16 citing·40 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2000The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations8,615 cited
1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
1997Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases1,071 cited
1974Organizational Decision Making as a Political Process: The Case of a University Budget798 cited
1979Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States.510 cited
2002Why good accountants do bad audits.369 cited
1967Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration, and Authorship330 cited
1994Prometheus Bound318 cited
1992Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy280 cited
1991New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System248 cited
1998The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science226 cited
1998Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

146 cited

1979Peer Review at the NSF: A Dialectical Policy Analysis124 cited

Cited by

2013Gender and innovation: state of the art and a research agenda278 cited
2010Coordination modes in public funding systems82 cited
2018Gender imbalance in senior positions in higher education: what is the problem? What can be done?79 cited
2012Extramural research grants and scientists’ funding strategies: Beggars cannot be choosers?77 cited
2005Competition for funding as an indicator of research competitiveness74 cited
2017What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?68 cited
2009Research Governance in Academia: Are There Alternatives to Academic Rankings?68 cited
2020The funding-productivity-gender nexus in science, a multistage analysis68 cited
2014The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels64 cited
2009Reflexive Evaluation of an Academic–Industry Research Collaboration: Can Mode 2 Management Research be Achieved?64 cited
2016Technology transfer executives' backwards integration: An examination of interactions between university technology transfer executives and principal investigators62 cited
2012Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure62 cited
2017The determinants of research performance in European universities: a large scale multilevel analysis58 cited
2016Who gets Horizon 2020 research grants? Propensity to apply and probability to succeed in a two-step analysis57 cited
2012The Selection of Scientific Talent in the Allocation of Research Grants44 cited
2018Closed clubs: Network centrality and participation in Horizon 202044 cited