Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Individual BRICS or a collective bloc? Convergence and divergence amongst ‘emerging donor’ nations

16 references·16 citing·34 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2017Economic and Political Weekly8,972 cited
2000Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?2,585 cited
2008Whose aid? Whose influence? China, emerging donors and the silent revolution in development assistance711 cited
2006Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?624 cited
2006Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers?544 cited
2011Aid ‘With Chinese Characteristics’: Chinese Foreign Aid and Development Finance Meet the OECD-DAC Aid Regime527 cited
1979The US Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Models340 cited
2006Will ‘Emerging Donors’ Change the Face of International Co‐operation?338 cited
2011Are ‘New’ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid Between nonDAC and DAC Donor Countries304 cited
1976A Model of the Supply of Bilateral Foreign Aid271 cited
1995From domestic to international justice: the welfare state and foreign aid242 cited
2008How China delivers development assistance to Africa218 cited
2008The Return of Non‐DAC Donors to Africa: New Prospects for African Development?211 cited
2011More Actors, More Money, More Ideas for International Development Co-operation198 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2005The shifting politics of foreign aid183 cited

2001Reconceptualizing Foreign Aid124 cited

Cited by

2016Atmospheric consequences of trade and human development: A case of BRIC countries104 cited
2017Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda44 cited
2020The Chinese South-South development cooperation: an assessment of its structural transformation39 cited
2014Brazil's International Development Co‐operation: Old and New Motivations38 cited
2018Donor proliferation to what ends? New donor countries and the search for legitimacy37 cited
2015The DAC is Dead, Long Live the DCF? A Comparative Analysis of the OECD Development Assistance Committee and the UN Development Cooperation Forum20 cited
2015New donors, same old practices? South-South Cooperation of Latin American emerging donors19 cited
2014Triangular cooperation and the global governance of development assistance: Canada and Brazil as “co-donors”18 cited
2016Understanding the nature of change: how institutional perspectives can inform contemporary studies of development cooperation16 cited
2019Donors in transition and the future of development cooperation: What do the data from Brazil, India, China, and South Africa reveal?16 cited
2020On becoming a development cooperation partner: Kazakhstan’s foreign policy, identity, and international norms9 cited
2014Russia as a Recruited Development Donor9 cited
2020Conceptualising Ideational Convergence of China and OECD Donors: Coalition Magnets in Development Cooperation9 cited
2017Beyond binaries: constructing new development partnerships with middle-income countries8 cited
2014Russia as a returning donor – four roles in development assistance to education7 cited
2013Challenging Development Cooperation? A Literature Review of the Approaches of the Emerging Powers6 cited