SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Randomization in surgical trials
8 references·2 citing·39 second hop
Randomization in surgical trials (2002)Randomization in surgical trialsReporting Clinical Trials in General Surgical Journals (2007)Reporting Clinical Trials in …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Physician Interpretations and…How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature? (2000)How Well Are Randomized Contr…Methodologic standards in surgical trials (1996)Methodologic standards in sur…Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Assessing the Quality of Rand…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)A method for assessing the qu…The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial Reporting in Spine Literature (2011)The Quality of Randomized Con…In a review of stroke rehabilitation studies, concealed allocation was under reported (2008)In a review of stroke rehabil…Design of Experiments (1936)Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)Treatment Research at the Crossroads: The Scientific Interface of Clinical Trials and Effectiveness Research (1999)Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials (2004)The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials (2002)Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review (2005)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 2: Randomized Controlled Trials (2008)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Analysis of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery (1997)Treating Individuals 1 - External validity of randomised controlled trials: "To whom do the results of this trial apply?"' (2005)Trends in the Quality of Highly Cited Surgical Research Over the Past 20 Years (2008)Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trials (1980)Findings for Public Health From Meta-Analyses (1985)Critical analysis of clinical research reporting in pediatric surgery: justifying the need for a new standard (2003)Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting (2006)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The quality of randomised controlled trials involving surgery from the hand to the elbow (2017)Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of surgical randomized clinical trials (2020)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
  • 1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
  • 2001Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials256 cited
  • 2000How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature?126 cited
  • 1996Methodologic standards in surgical trials84 cited
  • 2007Reporting Clinical Trials in General Surgical Journals49 cited

Cited by

  • 2011The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial Reporting in Spine Literature15 cited
  • 2008In a review of stroke rehabilitation studies, concealed allocation was under reported9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work