SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Modeling Ranking, Time Trade-Off, and Visual Analog Scale Values for EQ-5D Health States
13 references·6 citing·38 second hop
Modeling Ranking, Time Trade-Off, and Visual Analog Scale Values for EQ-5D Health States (2009)Modeling Ranking, Time Trade-Off, and Vis…Quantification of the level descriptors for the standard EQ-5D three-level system and a five-level version according to two methods (2008)Quantification of the level d…Comparing the Standard EQ-5D Three-Level System with a Five-Level Version (2007)Comparing the Standard EQ-5D …Using rank data to estimate health state utility models (2006)Using rank data to estimate h…US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States (2005)US Valuation of the EQ-5D Hea…Structural Equation Modeling of Paired-Comparison and Ranking Data. (2005)Structural Equation Modeling …EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history (2005)EQ-5D concepts and methods: A…Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data (2003)Reconsidering the use of rank…A Comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish General Population Time Trade-off Values for EQ-5D Health States (2001)A Comparison of United Kingdo…Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey (1998)Variations in population heal…Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States (1997)Modeling Valuations for EuroQ…Time trade-off user manual: props and self-completion methods (1994)Time trade-off user manual: p…Measuring Preferences for Health States Worse than Death (1994)Measuring Preferences for Hea…Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (1972)Conditional logit analysis of…GRADE-Leitlinien: 19. Bewertung der Vertrauenswürdigkeit der Evidenz für die Bedeutung von Endpunkten oder Werten und Präferenzen – Risiko für Bias und Indirektheit (2021)GRADE-Leitlinien: 19. Bewertu…GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness (2018)GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessi…Choice Defines QALYs (2018)Choice Defines QALYsHealth Preference Research: An Overview (2017)Health Preference Research: A…Quantifying Long-Term Care Preferences (2014)Quantifying Long-Term Care Pr…The Value of a QALY: Individual Willingness to Pay for Health Gains Under Risk (2013)The Value of a QALY: Individu…Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal (1986)EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life (1990)Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales (1991)Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets (2012)Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England (2017)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 (2002)Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) (2011)Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study (2012)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)EuroQol: the current state of play (1996)Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D (2001)Self-Reported Population Health: An International Perspective based on EQ-5D (2013)Specification Tests in Econometrics (1978)Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2001)Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer (2007)Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items (2009)Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D (2016)Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines (1993)Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the EQ-5D in patients with rheumatic diseases (2005)Health state utilities in non–small cell lung cancer: An international study (2016)Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1945)Decision analysis and behavioral research (1986)EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group (2001)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (2019)GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence—An overview in the context of health decision-making (2020)GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy (2020)Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy (1980)Macroeconomics and Reality (1980)Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2001)Discrete Choice Modeling for the Quantification of Health States: The Case of the EQ-5D (2010)Quality of life in adults who stutter (2011)Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods (2012)Rethinking and Updating Demographic Questions: Guidance to Improve Descriptions of Research Samples (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1972Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior14,281 cited
  • 1997Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States4,547 cited
  • 2005US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States1,281 cited
  • 1998Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey1,059 cited
  • 1994Measuring Preferences for Health States Worse than Death364 cited
  • 2001A Comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish General Population Time Trade-off Values for EQ-5D Health States338 cited
  • 2007Comparing the Standard EQ-5D Three-Level System with a Five-Level Version275 cited
  • 2005EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history200 cited
  • 2006Using rank data to estimate health state utility models130 cited
  • 2005Structural Equation Modeling of Paired-Comparison and Ranking Data.120 cited
  • 2003Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data119 cited
  • 1994Time trade-off user manual: props and self-completion methods104 cited
  • 2008Quantification of the level descriptors for the standard EQ-5D three-level system and a five-level version according to two methods84 cited

Cited by

  • 2018GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

295 cited
  • 2013The Value of a QALY: Individual Willingness to Pay for Health Gains Under Risk60 cited
  • 2018Choice Defines QALYs58 cited
  • 2014Quantifying Long-Term Care Preferences57 cited
  • 2017Health Preference Research: An Overview47 cited
  • 2021GRADE-Leitlinien: 19. Bewertung der Vertrauenswürdigkeit der Evidenz für die Bedeutung von Endpunkten oder Werten und Präferenzen – Risiko für Bias und Indirektheit8 cited