Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Cancer Nursing Research

16 references·3 citing·34 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.7,009 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,858 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,019 cited
2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
2007Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review827 cited
1998The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials769 cited
1999Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials649 cited
2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
2004Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

300 cited

2005The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement216 cited

2004An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods209 cited

Cited by

2017A Survey of the Prevalence and Impact of Reporting Guideline Endorsement in Pathology Journals13 cited
2019Reporting sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials published in nursing journals: A cross-sectional study12 cited
2014Hoping for a TREND toward PRISMA: The Variety and Value of Research Reporting Guidelines10 cited