No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Recent historical studies on medicine as a tool of empire have underlined the importance of local perceptions and responses when analysing the strategies and impact of European and North-American powers in various regions of the globe.1These studies have suggested that the development of tropical medicine has not been a one-way street, that the rich texture of local societies occupied a central place in this process, and that authority had to be negotiated and accommodated by recipients who were able to redefine imported ideas and institutions.2This article adds to this literature by using comparative history and by suggesting that developments in the so-called "periphery" provide crucial insight into the work of the metropolitan scientific centres.This article analyses the achievements and difficulties confronted both by Peruvian researchers trying to reinforce a local medical culture in a poor country and by U.S. investigators endeavouring to persuade philanthropic sponsors of the need to establish tropical medicine as an independent academic subject.The story takes place in early twentieth-century Peru, a country that in the wake of its defeat in the War with Chile (1879-1883) initiated a process of national reconstruction and modernization based on an agreement with foreign bondholders.This included ceding control of its railroads for sixty-six years, the arrival of major U.S. investments which displaced the dominant
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.