What’s old is new, and new is old: History and geography’s quantitative revolutions

Abstract

The article provides a critical commentary on papers by Ron Johnston et al. (2014) and Elvin Wyly (2014) about the different forms of geography’s quantitative revolution. The paper argues that in both cases the respective authors should have striven for a more robust historical exploration.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.