Medical Authorship: Traditions, Trends, and Tribulations

Abstract

History of Medicine15 August 1990Medical Authorship: Traditions, Trends, and TribulationsW. Bruce Fye, MD, MAW. Bruce Fye, MD, MASearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-113-4-317 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptThe biomedical literature serves many purposes. From it we learn what is known and what we seek to know. Communication of new concepts and discoveries is a critical part of the advance of medicine—whether at the bedside or in the laboratory. There are many components of what may be termed the industry of biomedical communication; this paper focuses on the dynamics of medical authorship. Among the themes considered are the incentives that motivate physicians and scientists to write, the rewards of authorship, the relationships of medical authors and editors, and the consequences of the current structure and philosophy of academic...References1. Fye W. The Development of American Physiology: Scientific Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1987. Google Scholar2. Ludmerer K. Learning to Heal: The Development of American Medical Education. New York: Basic Books; 1985. Google Scholar3. Taylor J. What constitutes a practical medical paper? Monthly Cyclopaedia of Practical Medicine. 1907;10:360. Google Scholar4. Sprengel K. Preface. In: Neue Litterarische Nachrichten für Aerzte, Wundaerzte und Naturforscher. 1786;1:1. Translated in: Kronick DA. A History of Scientific and Technical Periodicals: The Origins and Development of the Scientific and Technological Press, 1665-1790. 2d ed. Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press; 1976:197. Google Scholar5. Relman A. Publications and promotions for the clinical investigator. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979;25:673-6. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Huth E. The physician as author of medical information. Bull NY Acad Med. 1985;61:275-82. MedlineGoogle Scholar7. OrrAbdianLeeds RGA. Generation of information: published output of U.S. biomedical research. Fed Proc. 1964;23:1297-309. MedlineGoogle Scholar8. Garfield E. Which medical journals have the greatest impact? Ann Intern Med. 1986;105:313-20. LinkGoogle Scholar9. Gould G. Some relations of author, publisher, editor, and profession. Bulletin of the American Academy of Medicine. 1897;3:109-19. Google Scholar10. Geddings E. Preface. Baltimore Medical and Surgical Journal and Review. 1833;1:iii-iv. Google Scholar11. Billings J. Literature and institutions. Am J Med Sci. 1876;72:439-80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar12. The change. JAMA. 1883;1:28-9. Google Scholar13. [ Shrady G. ] American medical journalism. Medical Record. 1870;5: 349-50. Google Scholar14. Bean W. My sampler of editors: A Fishbein, a Fox, and a Garland. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:229-33. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15. [ Hays I. ] [Advertisement]. Am J Med Sci. 1827,1:vii. Google Scholar16. Cassedy J. The flourishing and character of early American medical journalism, 1797-1860. J. Hist Med Allied Sci. 1983;38:135-50. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17. Gross S. History of American Medical Literature, from 1776 to the Present Time. (1876, reprint). New York: Burt Franklin; 1972. Google Scholar18. Billings J. Letter to G. Stanley Hall ca. 1895. In: John Shaw Billings Papers. Rare Books and Manuscripts Division, New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations, New York, New York. Google Scholar19. Endowment of research. Medical and Surgical Reporter. 1882;46: 658. Google Scholar20. RosenHoffman MB. The cost of scientific communication: the scientist as ad-man [Editorial]. Circ Res. 1977;40:1-2. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21. Instructions to authors. Circulation. 1989;79;A17. Google Scholar22. . Copyright and re-publication policy of Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:1-9. LinkGoogle Scholar23. Proceedings of the National Medical Conventions, Held in New York, May, 1846, and in Philadelphia, May, 1847. Philadelphia: American Medical Association; 1847. Google Scholar24. Mitchell SW to Joseph Henry, 6 May 1863. Henry Papers, Smithsonian Institution. Washington DC. Google Scholar25. Fye W. S. Weir Mitchell, Philadelphia's "lost" physiologist. Bull Hist Med. 1983;57:188-202. MedlineGoogle Scholar26. [ Shrady G. ] Medical appointments. Medical Record. 1866;1:477-8. Google Scholar27. [ Shrady G. ] Medical authorship. Medical Record. 1867;2:445-6. Google Scholar28. Rothstein W. American Physicians in the Nineteenth Century: From Sects to Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1972. Google Scholar29. Fye W. The literature of American internal medicine: a historical view. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:451-60. LinkGoogle Scholar30. Bonner T. American Doctors and German Universities: A Chapter in International Intellectual Relations, 1870-1914. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press; 1963. Google Scholar31. Shrady G German medical journals. Medical Record. 1884,26:71-2. Google Scholar32. Billroth T. The Medical Sciences in the German Universities: A Study in the History of Civilization. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1924. Google Scholar33. Berliner H. A System of Scientific Medicine: Philanthropic Foundations in the Flexner Era. New York: Tavistock Publications; 1985. Google Scholar34. Fye W. Carl Ludwig and the Leipzig Physiological Institute: "A factory of new knowledge". Circulation. 1986;74:920-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar35. Ben-David J. Scientific productivity and academic organization in nineteenth-century medicine. In: Barber B, Hirsch W, eds. The Sociology of Science. New York: Free Press of Glencoe; 1962:305-29. Google Scholar36. Holmes B. Medical literature in relation to professional esteem. IV. Lancet-Clinic. 1915;114:465-8. Google Scholar37. Simmons G. Medical periodical literature. Proceedings of the Institute of Medicine of Chicago. 1921;3:283-300. Google Scholar38. de Solla Price D. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press; 1963. CrossrefGoogle Scholar39. GinzbergDutka EA. The Financing of Biomedical Research. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1989. Google Scholar40. JonasEtzel HS. Undergraduate medical education. JAMA. 1989; 262:1011-9. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar41. KrumlandWillGorry REG. Scientific publications of a medical school faculty. J Med Educ. 1979;54:876-84. MedlineGoogle Scholar42. Petersdorf R. Academic medicine: no longer threadbare or genteel. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:841-3. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar43. Stossel T. Volume: papers and academic promotion [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:146-9. LinkGoogle Scholar44. GjerdeClementsClements CWB. Publication characteristics of family practice faculty nominated for academic promotion. J Fam Pract. 1982;15:663-6. MedlineGoogle Scholar45. Shapiro S. The decision to publish. Ethical dilemmas. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38:365-72. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar46. Morgan P. Journal publication and academic careers: publish or peerish? [Editorial]. Can Med Assoc J. 1984;130:96. MedlineGoogle Scholar47. Relman A. The purposes and prospects of The General Medical Journal. Bull NY Acad Med. 1988;64:875-80. MedlineGoogle Scholar48. Comroe J Publish and/or perish. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976; 113:561-5. MedlineGoogle Scholar49. Friedell M. How to get an article published in the journal. Int Surg. 1977;62:406-8. MedlineGoogle Scholar50. Billings J. An address on our medical literature. Br Med J. 1881; 2:262-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar51. Huth E. How to Write and Publish Papers in the Medical Sciences. Philadelphia: ISI Press; 1982. Google Scholar52. Borenstein B. When to write. Trans Stud Coll Physicians Phila. 1985;7:189-93. MedlineGoogle Scholar53. Garland J. Controversies in medical education. N Engl J Med. 1964;271:1067-8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar54. KrebsMartin HA. Reminiscences and Reflections. London: Oxford University Press; 1981:98-9. Google Scholar55. Roberts W. Reviews of classic books and ineptness of reviewers: lessons for judges of medical manuscripts [Editorial]. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:922-3. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar56. Barton B. General plan of the Philadelphia Medical and Physical Journal. Philadelphia Medical and Physical Journal. 1804;1:v-vii. Google Scholar57. RobinBurke EC. Peer review in medical journals. Chest. 1987;91:252-7. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar58. Lock S. A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine. London: The Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust; 1985. Google Scholar59. Angell M. Publish or perish: a proposal. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104: 261-2. LinkGoogle Scholar60. Relman A. Publish or perish—or both [Editorial]. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:724-5. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar61. Stetten D Publication: numbers and quality [Letter]. Science. 1986;232:11. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar62. Selye H. Can we cope with the 'literature explosion?' J Med. 1970;1:3-8. MedlineGoogle Scholar63. Strasburger V. Righting medical writing [Editorial]. JAMA. 1985; 254:1789-90. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar64. Morgan P. How many authors can dance on the head of an article? Can Med Assoc J. 1984,130:842. MedlineGoogle Scholar65. Durack D. The weight of medical knowledge. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:773-5. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar66. Friesinger G. Who should be an author? [Editorial]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8:1240-2. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar67. Burman K. "Hanging from the masthead": reflections on authorship. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:602-5. LinkGoogle Scholar68. Garfield E. The ethics of scientific publication: authorship attribution and citation amnesia. In: Essays of an Information Scientist. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1983;5:622-6. Google Scholar69. [ Huth EJ. ] Authorship from the reader's side. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:613-4. LinkGoogle Scholar70. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:258-65. LinkGoogle Scholar71. Huth E. Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:269-74. LinkGoogle Scholar72. Huth E. Abuses and uses of authorship [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:266-7. LinkGoogle Scholar73. Osler W. British medicine in Greater Britain. [Citation 1156] In: Golden RL, Roland CG. Sir William Osler: An Annotated Bibliography with Illustrations. San Francisco: Norman Publishing; 1988: 103. Google Scholar74. Sigerist H. Waste and economy in the publication of research. Bull Hist Med. 1941;9:1-7. Google Scholar75. Weiler A. Editorial policy and the assessment of quality among medical journals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987;75:310-6. MedlineGoogle Scholar76. Donaldson R Exclusive publication [Editorial]. Gastroenterology. 1976;70:811-2. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar77. CorningCummings MM. Biomedical communications. In: Bowers JZ, Purcell EF, eds. Advances in American Medicine: Essays at the Bicentennial Colloquium on the Bicentennial of Medicine in the United States. v 2. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation; 1976:722-73. Google Scholar78. Gould G. The medical press. American Lancet. 1893;17:200-4. Google Scholar79. Garfield E. Journal selection for Current Contents: editorial merit vs. political pressure. In: Ghostwriting and Other Essays. Philadelphia: ISI Press; 1986:96-104. Google Scholar80. PocockHughesLee SMR. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:426-32. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar81. FletcherFletcher RS. Clinical research in general medical journals: a 30-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:180-3. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar82. BeggBerlin CJ. Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1988;151(part 3):419-63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar83. Dusseau J. Responsibility of the learned journal. Perspect Biol Med. 1989;32:344-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar84. Petersdorf R. The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:252-4. LinkGoogle Scholar85. Szilagyi D. The elusive target: truth in scientific reporting. Comments on error, self-delusion, deceit, and fraud. J Vase Surg. 1984; 1:243-53. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar86. StewartFeder WN. The integrity of the scientific literature. Nature. 1987;325:207-14. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar87. Altschule M. Medical discovery. The problem of uniqueness. Ala J Med Sci. 1986;23:222-4. MedlineGoogle Scholar88. Bennett J. Policy regarding rapid publication. Am J Med. 1987;83: 1015. CrossrefGoogle Scholar89. Bowditch H. Letter to Olivia Bowditch, 14 October 1867. In: Bowditch VY, ed. Life and Correspondence of Henry Ingersoll Bowditch. v 2. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company; 1902:146. Google Scholar90. Holmes O. Dedicatory address. In: Dedication of the New Building and Hall of the Boston Medical Library Association. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Riverside Press; 1881:1-21. Google Scholar91. Garfield E. Is there room in science for self-promotion? Scientist. 1987;1(27):9. Google Scholar92. Walgate R. AIDS. Politics of premature French claim of cure. Nature. 1985;318:3. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar93. Ingelfinger F. Medical literature: the campus without tumult. Science. 1970;169:831-7. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar94. Relman A. An open letter to the news media [Editorial]. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:554-5. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar95. Starr P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. New York: Basic Books; 1982. Google Scholar This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: W. Bruce Fye, MD, MAThis paper was presented at a symposium, "The Medical Journal: Past, Present, and Future," held in honor of Edward J. Huth, Editor of Annals of Internal Medicine, on 13 September 1989. Dr. Huth retired as Editor on 30 June 1990. The papers from the symposium will be published in a Festschrift in his honor. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byETHICS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH AND PUBLISHINGI , we and they : A linguistic and narrative exploration of the authorship processLosing young researchers in the authorship battle, under-reported casualtiesAssessment of author ranking indices based on multi-authorshipEthics of Scientific PublishingAuthorshipOpinions on AuthorshipAuthorship Proliferation in Hand Surgery Research: How Many Hand Surgeons Does it Take to Write a Research Article?The making of an authorUsing Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research ImpactPerceptions of authors' contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding authorResuscitating a Circulation Abstract to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Coronary Care Unit ConceptAuthorship and Sampling Practice in Selected Biomechanics and Sports Science JournalsAnálisis del conocimiento de los criterios internacionales de autoría por parte de los investigadores españolesAuthorship Trends in the American Journal of Health EducationValoración de la producción científica de los profesionales sanitarios: una propuestaAuthorship: an ethical dilemma of scienceMedical Record Reviews in Emergency Medicine: The Blessing and the CurseScientific authorshipImage License from RSNA: A New Threat to Responsible Authorship? [letter]Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies?President’s Page: Medical history: a valuable tool to help us frame the present and predict the futureThe Structure of a Neurosurgical ManuscriptTitle, Authors, and AbstractBiomedical Publication for Neurosurgery Residents: A Program and GuideBiomedical Publication for Neurosurgery Residents: A Program and GuideThe Effect of Changes in Guidelines for Authorship on Current Radiology PublicationsThe Gordian Knot of Multiple AuthorshipGuide to writing for publication in AJIC: American Journal of Infection ControlFrom Authorship to ContributorshipThe unmasked carnival of sciencePeer Review, Authorship, Ethics, and Conflict of InterestEvolución de los indicadores bibliométricos de producción y consumo de Archivos de Bronconeumología durante los últimos 20 añosFrom Laboratory to Scientific LiteratureEditorial Peer Review: Research, Current Practices, and Implications for LibrariansDuplicate publication in the nursing literatureChanges in study design, gender issues, and other characteristics of clinical research published in three major medical journals from 1971 to 1991Editorial peer review: Research, current practices, and implications for librariansETHICAL DIMENSIONS IN CHIROPRACTIC RESEARCHPublication of Research: The Ethical DimensionAuthorship ethics in the radiological sciencesCoauthorship Trends in the Leading Radiological JournalsBritish otorhinolaryngological research. An analysis of publication trendsTeaching dietetic interns to write for lay and professional audiencesPolicy mattersStyle and substance: further improvements.AuthorshipAngelo Taranta, MDDocumenting Contributions to AuthorshipG. B. John Mancini, MD 15 August 1990Volume 113, Issue 4Page: 317-325KeywordsForecastingMotivationResearch laboratoriesScientists ePublished: 1 December 2008 Issue Published: 15 August 1990 Copyright & Permissions© 1990 American College of PhysiciansPDF downloadLoading ...

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 64 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.