Common, specific, and treatment fit variables in psychotherapy outcome.

Abstract

The relative effects of and the relationship among specific interventions and nonspecific/relationship factors to improving treatment outcome have long been a source of debate among psychotherapists and outcome researchers. This study, the third in a series of analyses on a large, combined data set, tests the relative importance of two sets of “common factors” and two sets of “specific factors” that previous analyses have determined to be related to good treatment outcomes. Common factors included the therapeutic alliance and four patient factors. Specific factors included four dimensions of psychotherapy and four estimates of the fit between the characteristics of the patient and treatment factors. Patient, treatment, and treatment fit variables were assessed for their relative impact on both distal outcomes and proximal/ alliance factors to obtain an estimate of the causal chain that exists among relationship and treatment factors. The results indicated that patient, therapy, and matching patterns were significantly associated both with the

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.